美国.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has requested that the Federal Trade Commission investigate certain websites that sell assistance animal documentation for potential deceptive and unfair business practices. 这一行动不仅帮助消费者避免诈骗, but the letter should be of interest to landlords and property managers as it clarifies a common question about assistance animal certificates.
有什么问题??
根据联邦公平住房法, a landlord must grant a reasonable accommodation for an individual with a disability when it may be necessary for the individual to have an equal opportunity to enjoy and use the dwelling. A common request for a reasonable accommodation is a request to keep an animal as an assistance animal, 根据房东的宠物限制，哪些是禁止的. 一旦提出这样的要求，房东可以要求提供更多的信息.
如果一个人的残疾不明显或不为人所知, 房东可能会要求个人提供“可靠的文件”. HUD guidance says that reliable documentation could include things like a verification from a medical professional or a disability determination from a 政府ernment agency. The documentation is said to be sufficient if it establishes that the person has a disability and that the animal will provide some type of disability-related assistance.
这与援助动物证书有什么关系?
A frequent question on the 德州2021十大正规彩票app经纪人® 法律 Hotline is whether assistance animal certificates—certificates or 注册 purchased online by an individual in an effort to demonstrate an animal is an assistance animal under the Fair Housing Act—count as reliable documentation. HUD has long been silent on whether assistance animal certificates are considered reliable documentation.
在给联邦贸易委员会的信中, 住房和城市发展部明确表示，虽然提供远程服务的医疗保健专业人员, 包括在互联网上, may provide a reliable verification of an individual’s disability-related need for an assistance animal, the provider must have personal knowledge of the individual’s disability-related need for the animal. Personal knowledge is knowledge of the type that healthcare providers ordinarily use for diagnosis and treatment.
在HUD看来, these websites offer documentation that is not reliable because the website operators and healthcare professionals who consult with them lack the necessary personal knowledge about the individual. 这些网站通常通过在线问卷或问卷从个人那里获得信息, 最多, 简短的采访.
底线是什么?
HUD说认证, 注册, 通过这些网站购买的其他文件是没有必要的, 可能不包含可靠的信息, and are insufficient to establish an individual’s disability-related need for an assistance animal.
是时候了!
那么，这到底有什么帮助呢? 什么, 具体地说, 房东和物业经理可以要求文件是否来自在线公司吗? 如何知道文档来自在线组? 如果确定为在线认证, 房东可以拒绝租给潜在客户吗? 这也适用于高层建筑吗?
我的想法.这样一篇模棱两可的文章.他们需要记下具体的指导方针.
换句话说，他们仍然不知道. 我认为未来的方向是，在线证书可能会受到挑战.
阿门! 谢谢你！! 最好的消息!
大小也有例外吗?..如果党“需要”2只动物......这太疯狂了
还在等待“最终”裁决…. 是住房和城市发展部, NAR, 焦油, or the TWC Consumer Rights Division going to let us know IF AND WHEN we can reject these purchased on-line certifications for Assistance Animals? 我们的屁股现在都暴露在外面了! How are we supposed to handle it when a Property Owner absolutely refuses to allow “pets” but the Tenant in the home has an Assistance Animal Certification purchased from an on-line “therapists”? 就像现在一样, 如果我们拒绝认证，我们可能会被起诉，我们也可能被业主起诉… 阅读更多»
玻利瓦尔岛的人口, TX等于2,417 -渡轮的医疗紧急通行证的数量是惊人的-做研究. It’s mind bending AND the service animal thing has only just begun… people with service animals WILL find doctors to do exactly has HUD has described. $$Money$$ always finds ways around rules and laws – LOVE of service dog surpass $$Money$$ on EVERY Level…. 他们不会把兔子放回帽子里的.
终于! 朝着正确的方向前进! So, 澄清一下, 我可以拒绝这只动物，因为从一个随机的网站上找到的文件, 我也可以花69美元买到.95被认为是不可靠的, 还有来自6个州的心理学家的信, (with no stated evidence that the applicant ever resided in that state ) is now considered unreliable as well? 美好的一天! 请TREC, 焦油, pass this on to the Fed Rep and 焦油 legal counsel for the Winter Meeting so the 物业管理 Committee Meeting attendees can be advised properly, 我们可以避免… 阅读更多»
最后!!!
我有一只服务犬，当我看到这些人和他们的假服务犬时，我感到很恶心. .
而他们却逃脱了惩罚
很高兴看到这个
Ok. 他们没有问潜在租户实际的诊断，对吧? 医生的诊断书上写着“我是医生”之类的话. 克雷和男孩是我的病人. 随时都需要他的动物? 似乎快要违反隐私条例了. 没有人愿意再为自己的选择负责了. 运用你的判断力，更多地了解该租户. 我能立刻认出一个负责任的宠物主人. 在你让别人住在你的房子里之前，先培养你的人际交往能力. 这是常识. 这才是真正的问题. 房东不想要… 阅读更多»
你错过了整个对话. 这是关于服务性动物，而不是宠物. 房东不能拒绝拥有服务性动物的房客. 我的责任保险不包括某些动物，比如比特犬, 然而，有了证书，我被迫在没有保险和违反法律之间选择. 直说吧，宠物和服务性动物是有区别的.
完全. 房东和物业经理仍然处于不利地位.
虽然这篇文章令人困惑，可能会误导, the letter from Secretary Ben Carson (HUD) on the link at the bottom of the article is much more clear as to the issues, 房东和物业管理者面临的挑战和解决的方向. 我2021十大正规彩票app先读一读这封信, and recommend to 焦油 that you simply publish the letter from HUD next time and don’t try to inte弹性分组环et what was already very clearly written from the Secretary of HUD. 感谢您提供的链接和信息.
蒂姆说得好. The letter is very clear and is asking the FTC to investigate these websites that are offering documentation that does not pass the HUD standard for appropriate service animal certification. 我很感谢HUD在这个问题上的这封信和澄清.
我同意里克的观点，是时候了!
这个问题将继续得到改进，以帮助避免混淆和滥用. This is the key phrase “the provider must have personal knowledge of the individual’s disability-related need for the animal. Personal knowledge is knowledge of the type that healthcare providers ordinarily use for diagnosis and treatment.” “Personal knowledge” This is huge as it eliminates people just downloading a service animal certificate from an internet site.
我参加这个讨论有点晚了, but I agree 100% with the statement regarding the online Docs not having enough knowledge of the person to properly diagnose them. I for 1 am sickened by the abuse that property owners are subjected to because of the extreme penalties for making a mistake in declining an animal. I currently have an owner with a 150 lb animal in their property because of one of these out of state doctors. 这简直荒谬至极. 我很想看到一些指导方针，像当地医生的资格最低… 阅读更多»